|
|
Post by Cycle like Sedins on Jul 22, 2009 18:01:51 GMT -5
Let's do this the simplest way possible. Instead of doing a poll (again, I distrust these things because of Jeb. Bush, Rory Fitzpatrickgate and the All-Star voting) we'll count your comments as a vote instead.
So, simply enough, choose one of the two options:
Option 1: Standard snake draft
1-30 first round
30-1 second round
1-30 third
30-1 fourth
rinse, repeat
Option 2: Joe's snake draft (he could feel free to explain it more accurately, but the basic idea would be something like):
1-30 first round
30-1 second round
30-1 third
1-30 fourth
We'll let the sweaty masses decide this one. Have at it.
|
|
|
|
Post by johntrustsinlou on Jul 22, 2009 18:20:01 GMT -5
You couldn't make this a poll.
OK. I choose Option 1. It's what most fantasy drafts use, right?
|
|
|
|
Post by iamjoe on Jul 22, 2009 18:23:16 GMT -5
I vote for my proposed snake.
Why? Because pick #1 is far more valuable than pick #30. Whoever gets picked at #30, though a first rounder, will be no where near as valuable as the possible picks at #1. To help make up for the fact that there is a very small amount of truly top-tier talent in the NHL. Changing the order to give those in the 20-30's an extra early pick through the first couple rounds will narrow that advantage to the top teams by giving the later teams an extra chance at slightly better depth, rather than having one of those super-talents like Ovie/Malkin/etc.
|
|
|
|
Post by dagmar27 on Jul 22, 2009 18:37:23 GMT -5
Option 1
|
|
|
|
Post by paulhinrichsen on Jul 22, 2009 18:45:16 GMT -5
option 1 and we need to start a vote on allowing trades
|
|
|
|
Post by scottyhockey on Jul 22, 2009 18:49:26 GMT -5
Regular snake ...
|
|
|
|
Post by crashthecrease on Jul 22, 2009 19:01:02 GMT -5
Option 1
|
|
|
|
Post by chriskontos on Jul 22, 2009 19:33:06 GMT -5
Uno. (Spanish for 1)
|
|
|
|
Post by vanekatthedisco on Jul 22, 2009 19:33:13 GMT -5
This will inevitably come to an impasse, picks 1-15 will vote for a regular snake, while 16-30 will vote the opposite.
So, with that in mind, seeing as I have a bottom 5 pick, count my vote behind iamjoe.
|
|
|
|
Post by vancitycanuck on Jul 22, 2009 19:33:45 GMT -5
Option 1 please.
|
|
|
|
Post by stormingthecrease on Jul 22, 2009 19:41:56 GMT -5
I vote for a standard snake draft.
|
|
|
|
Post by chihawksgirl924 on Jul 22, 2009 20:57:01 GMT -5
Option 1
|
|
|
|
Post by Cycle like Sedins on Jul 22, 2009 21:06:55 GMT -5
This will inevitably come to an impasse, picks 1-15 will vote for a regular snake, while 16-30 will vote the opposite. So, with that in mind, seeing as I have a bottom 5 pick, count my vote behind iamjoe. Yeah, I kinda thought that might happen. If it is a true tie I guess I'll just throw a dart at the number 1 or 2. |
|
|
|
Post by hildymac on Jul 22, 2009 21:16:26 GMT -5
Good with option numero one-o.
|
|
|
|
Post by Defending Big D on Jul 22, 2009 21:43:49 GMT -5
I'm for #1, but I'm in that biased top half.
|
|
